SEO? any truth to this?

[Olynsky]

I have always been a little frustrated by the fact that good serach engine rankings relied on "static web pages" versus the normal database-driven dynamic content. It seems to be a popular and (truthful??) belief that Google a few others don't take well to a query string. Which is a real pain in ass for people like me.

Is this really true? Does it really make that much of a difference?

Looking for feedback on this...

[michellebarkley]

Its true that static page are good for optimization but dynamic page can also be optimized there are some techniques that is used to optimize a dynamic page one of them is rewriting of dynamic page so that search engine can treate as a static page.

[pakistanboy]

Hi, Guyz...
Thanks to share this news with us.


Thankyou,
Regards,
Pakistan Boy,

[/URL][URL="http://www.PakistanGiftsShop.com"]
(http://www.PakistanGiftsMall.com)

[seo-2009]

if your url has session ids like &id=0003443434 then probably it will not be crawled by search engines.